← All articles

CASE STUDY : Digitegu 2025 winner ePPC solved Ecosh’s attribution puzzle and increased the revenue by 56%

Meta said it drove 54% of Ecosh Life’s revenue. Google Analytics said 5.89%. Ecosh Life, Estonia’s first premium dietary supplement brand, was making sizable investments in Meta and Google Ads, and with numbers that far apart, the team couldn’t agree on which channels were actually driving revenue, or where to spend next.

Our agency, together with Meta Ads professional and our cooperation partner, Andrus Kiisküla, stepped in with a solution rooted in Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM), helping Ecosh cut through attribution confusion and drive growth.

The Attribution Problem

In the first two quarters of 2024, Meta ads and Google ads were claiming more than 50% of the revenue, raising the conflicting question.

Share of revenue each platform claimed
Platform reporting, Q1 to Q2 2024
51.0%49.0%
Google Ads claims 51%
54.0%46.0%
Meta Ads claims 54%
Together that is 105% of revenue, before email, organic search or direct traffic get any credit.

The GA4 dilemma: When GA4 and Platforms Disagree

According to GA4, Meta ads accounted for only 5.89% of Ecosh’s total revenue. At the same time, Meta’s own reporting showed that nearly 54% of revenue came from Meta Ads. A stark discrepancy that left the team asking: Who is right?

Revenue by source in GA4
Meta Ads (5.89%) is part of “Other”
  • google / cpc45.7%
  • (direct) / (none)17.7%
  • klaviyo / email13.7%
  • google / organic11.6%
  • Other11.3%

This kind of contradiction isn’t uncommon. Standard last-click and platform-specific attribution models tend to undervalue upper-funnel activity like brand awareness, creative exposure, and indirect conversions. In Ecosh’s case, the difference was too large to ignore, and it threatened the efficiency of every marketing decision moving forward.

How advertising affects revenue

To solve this, we introduced a Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) approach. MMM is a statistical technique that estimates the incremental contribution of each marketing channel by accounting for interactions, ad stock effects, and diminishing returns. Something traditional attribution tools struggle to do accurately.

What drives Ecosh’s revenue
Causal graph found by the model. Gold: Meta Ads and its direct effects.
TemperatureVitamin search interestMeta Ads spendGoogle Ads spendVitamin interest (rolling)Meta Ads impressionsBrand interest (rolling)Google Ads clicksRevenue
The arrow represents the direction of impact, e.g. search interest in vitamins affects brand interest

Here’s how we approached the challenge:

This analytical framework allowed us to look beyond simple click-to-conversion metrics and understand how each channel contributed to brand interest, engagement, and ultimately revenue.

Marginal Effect of Advertising Channels and What the Analysis Revealed

Once the MMM model was in place, the results told a very different story from the GA4 data. The analysis found that:

Marginal impact of daily spend
Extra revenue (€) for every extra €1 spent, over 30 days
05101520Meta AdsGoogle Ads2.5×at the same spendDaily spend →

Traditional attribution models had undervalued Meta’s contribution because they focus on lower-funnel touchpoints. But ignoring upper-funnel influence meant missing how brand exposure feeds into organic search and later conversions.

From Insight to Action: Forecasting Revenue and Guiding Budgets

With a reliable MMM framework, we didn’t just understand past performance. We also created a revenue forecasting system.

We developed an AI system to forecast next month’s revenue based on the planned budget and timeline. This system uses key inputs like next month’s dates and projected spend to estimate performance metrics such as impressions and clicks to simulate likely outcomes under different scenarios. These insights are then used to deliver a reliable revenue forecast, helping guide budget planning and investment decisions.

How the forecasting system works
Simplified architecture
Inputs
Meta Ads spend
Google Ads spend
Brand and vitamin interest
Dates and seasonality
Emails opened and clicked
Predicted media
Meta impressions
Meta clicks
Google impressions
Google clicks
Predicted
Organic clicks
Forecast
Revenue
Most inputs and all four media metrics also feed the revenue forecast directly, not only through organic clicks.

To understand how revenue might change, we ran simulations that included uncertainty and real-world variability. Each month, we examined worst-case, best-case, and most-likely revenue outcomes to inform scaling decisions.

Simulated daily revenue
How often each revenue level came up across the simulations
200300400500600700800Daily revenue →Worst case368Most probable500Best case631

This turned what was once guesswork into a data-driven budgeting process, allowing Ecosh to invest smarter rather than just harder.

The Results: Breakthrough Revenue Growth

The outcomes of MMM implementation speak for themselves. Over September and the fourth quarter:

Net revenue
September + Q4, index 2023 = 100
2023100.0
2024156.2
Media spend as % of revenue
September + Q4
202313.6%
202412.8%

These gains were driven not just by better attribution, but by strategic shifts informed by causal insight: recognizing where to protect spend, where to scale, and how each channel truly contributes to the customer journey.

Key Takeaways for Marketers

Ecosh’s case highlights several lessons for any enterprise wrestling with attribution:

  1. Attribution models can mislead when they ignore broader impact. Standard last-click measurement often fails to capture brand and upper-funnel influence, leading to underinvestment in channels that actually fuel growth.
  2. MMM provides clarity across the full marketing ecosystem. By incorporating causal modeling, ad stock, and saturation effects, brands gain a more accurate picture of how spend truly drives revenue.
  3. Data-driven forecasting strengthens decision-making. A revenue forecasting system grounded in causal insights helps teams plan with confidence, turning spend optimization from reactive to proactive.

Based on this specific case study, the key takeaways we noticed are:

  1. GA4 undervalues Meta Ads because it favors lower-funnel touchpoints. Causal inference analysis revealed that last-click logic hid Meta’s actual role in creating demand earlier in the customer journey.
  2. Meta influenced a much broader ecosystem than direct conversions. Its activity increased brand interest and drove conversions from both organic and paid search.
  3. Creative quality has a measurable impact on brand demand. Increases in brand interest are often driven by standout creative that ties all elements to the brand and sparks curiosity

ePPC team behind the success

This project was a success and won Digitegu 2025 thanks to a focused team combining deep channel expertise with advanced data science capabilities.

Want this thinking applied to your account?